Position of the Adirondack Council
the Clean Air Interstate Rule Formerly the Proposed Interstate
Air Quality Rule
(USEPA -- Federal Register--
January 30, 2004)
Click
to see the Council's Summary of the Regulation
Using strong advocacy based on
sound science, the Adirondack Council has worked diligently with
the scientific community, the media and fellow environmentalists
to save the Adirondack Park from its greatest threat-- destruction
from acid rain.
For more than a decade, the Adirondack
Council has sought to convince state and national regulators
and legislators of the need for significant new reductions in
the emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, two pre-cursors
to acid deposition, from the nation's power plants.
We have walked the halls of state
legislatures and our nation's Capitol. We have sponsored conferences
and produced educational materials. We have even gone to federal
court in pursuit of this important goal-- a mission shared by
thousands of our loyal members.
The United States Environmental
Protection Agency's (USEPA) new Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)
that was finalized on March 10, 2005, requires power plants in
the Eastern United States to significantly cut their emissions
of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx). The time frame
and the deep level of cuts proposed will be enough to end acid
rain damage in the Adirondacks.
Although the Council is disappointed
to see that Congress seems incapable of finding common ground
to pass legislation on air quality in this session, we are extremely
pleased that USEPA finalized CAIR and strongly support it.
The regional reductions in emissions
in CAIR exceed the cuts first proposed in legislation introduced
by the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan. The Moynihan legislation
was drafted to implement the recommendations of three reports
on acid rain received by Congress from federal agencies since
the initial acid rain program was adopted by Congress in 1990.
All three reports and many others outside of government found
that while the acid rain program was meeting its goals, the target
levels of emissions were too high to effectively stop the damage
done in the Adirondacks from acid rain. The reports uniformly
recommended building on the now established national cap and
trade program for sulfur emissions. They recommended requiring
new reductions in sulfur phased in over time, and the creation
of a similar emission control program for nitrogen emissions--
in the process, cutting national sulfur emissions by at least
another 50% and nitrogen pollution by more than 60%.
With CAIR, there will be a regional cap and trade program for
29 states east of the Mississippi River and the District of Columbia
that would meet and exceed those goals. In ten years, the Clean
Air Interstate Rule will cut sulfur emissions by another 70%
and nitrogen emissions by 65%.
In January of 2004, The Research
Council of the National Academy of Sciences recommended in a
Report to Congress, that EPA should look to address the regional
transport of pollution by regulating multiple pollutants from
similar sources using, whenever feasible, a market-based cap
and trade approach. In December of 2002, Environmental Defense,
a national environmental advocacy organization, issued a report
recommending that the USEPA adopt a cap and trade program for
year-round reductions of nitrogen in the eastern United States,
with additional cuts in the existing sulfur program.
The new USEPA rule exceeds the
emission reduction targets adopted in the acid rain platform
of the Association of New England Governors and Eastern Canadian
Premiers, adopted in 1999. The new rule is also consistent with
the recommendations of the Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative
(SAMI) which represented stakeholders from a number of mid-Atlantic
and southern states. SAMI issued a report in August of 2002,
which called for the establishment of a new cap and trade program
for power plant emissions of sulfur and nitrogen at least as
stringent as that now proposed by USEPA.
The existing market-based cap
and trade acid rain program has proven itself to be highly economical
with an almost perfect record of industry compliance. A similar
22 state cap and trade program to reduce ozone in the east coast
by capping nitrogen emissions from power plants in the summer
months goes into effect in May of 2004. The USEPA intends to
merge the two programs into a year-round program.
|