ADIRONDACK COUNCIL
FILES MOTION TO DISMISS LAWSUIT
DESIGNED TO SILENCE ORGANIZATIONS ADVOCACY
Landowner Angry over Park Agency Enforcement of Wetlands Laws
Accused
Environmental Org. of Tortious Interference with Contract
for Blowing Whistle
For more information:
John F. Sheehan
518-432-1770 (ofc)
518-441-1340 (cell)
Released: Wednesday, March 3,
2010
ELIZABETHTOWN, N.Y. The
Adirondack Council has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought
against the organization in State Supreme Court here, stating
not only that the charges were unfounded, but that the suit was
a violation of the organizations First Amendment right
to petition the government.
The Adirondack Council is also seeking to preserve the right
of ordinary citizens to anonymously report violations of state
land-use laws to the government.
The organization said it was seeking sanctions against the plaintiff
and his attorney for threatening the organization with a $3.1-million
legal action that amounted to a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public
Participation, or SLAPP suit, which are illegal in New York.
The mission of the Adirondack Council is to ensure the
ecological integrity and wild character of the Adirondack Park,
said Brian L. Houseal, the groups executive director. One
aspect of our work is to monitor the Adirondack Park Agency and
proposed development projects in the Park. It is our Constitutional
right to report apparent violations of the Adirondack Park Agency
Act or the Freshwater Wetlands Act to the proper authorities.
By law, enforcement complaints to the APA are required
to remain anonymous, Houseal explained. This is intended
to protect citizens from retribution. We strongly believe that
citizens have a right to report violations without fearing intimidation
and harassment from disappointed permit-seekers.
Houseal said that, for the purposes of the motion to dismiss,
the Adirondack Council acknowledges that it made inquiries to
the APA about the plaintiffs apparent land-use and wetlands
violations. The motion further explains that the Adirondack Council
has every right to make such inquiries and points out that the
plaintiffs suit never suggested that the Adirondack Councils
assertions were false.
Houseal said that the $3.1-million lawsuit filed against the
Adirondack Council last year by Silver Lake property owner LeRoy
Douglas and his Douglas Corporation of Silver Lake. The suit
contends that the Council communicated to the APA that Douglas
Corp. had violated the Wetlands Act and the APA Act, and that
this communication constitutes tortious interference with
contract.
We have a First Amendment right to make inquiries about
possible violations of the law, said Houseal. It
is unlawful to use baseless lawsuits to silence our right to
free speech and our right to petition the government. There are
specific protections in state and federal law that prohibit anyone
from using the courts to intimidate advocacy groups and whistle-blowers
into silence.
Houseal noted that the Adirondack Council has faced similar lawsuits
in the past. In the early 1990s, the Council and others were
sued for $50 million by Don Gerdts, Carol LaGrasse and Keith
VanBuskirk, who claimed the organization had undue influence
over the Adirondack Park Agency. The suit was dismissed in state
supreme court and rejected again by the Appellate Division.
Founded in 1975, the Adirondack Council is the leading environmental
advocacy organization in the Park with members in all 50 United
States. Its mission is to ensure the wild character and ecological
integrity of New Yorks 9,300-square-mile Adirondack Park.
The Council is privately funded. It neither solicits nor accepts
donations from government agencies or any other taxpayer-supported
sources.
|